Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
66.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.81 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €112.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a maximum drag of 6,8kg / 14,99lbs, while Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa Freams LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX
