Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
69.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
