Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX
Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
63.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Aero C3000X
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
