Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX
