Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
64.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Delphin YUPIE


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX
