Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX
Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
65.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX
Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X
Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag