Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa RX LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
