Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa TD FEEDER QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa TD FEEDER QD stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa TD FEEDER QD?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- A line retrieve score of 8.2 out of 10 87 centimeter), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (6) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX
