Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Delphin YUPIE


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX
