Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Delphin RAYA body
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Delphin RAYA body
Feeder And Match
44.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.63 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight584g / 20.6oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size55 Y
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/400
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX clearly outshines Delphin RAYA body, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin RAYA body may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Delphin RAYA body?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin RAYA body
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (7), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
