Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.5:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Penn Sargus II Spinning?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.6 out of 10 (5.5:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX
