Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a maximum drag of 6,8kg / 14,99lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.27 out of 10 (520g / 18,34oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX
