Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
63.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/240
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.6 out of 10 (91 centimeter / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
