Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
52.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/240
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a maximum drag of 6,8kg / 14,99lbs, while Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Penn Battle III 3000X
