Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C3000X clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (5+1) and gear ratio (5). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano AERO XR?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a line retrieve of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch (5.43 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Delphin RAYA body vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
