Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (5+1) and the gear ratio (4.7). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano AERO XR?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
