Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C3000X clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (5+1) and gear ratio (5). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano AERO XR?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a line retrieve of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch (5.43 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Delphin RAYA body vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
