Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
86.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.1:1) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Cardiff XR?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX
