Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
86.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.1:1) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Cardiff XR?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
