Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
86.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.1:1) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Cardiff XR?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
