Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.8:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Catana FE?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX
