Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
63.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Catana FE?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.6 out of 10 (91 centimeter / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM
