Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Shimano Catana FE C 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Catana FE C 3000X stands out for a ball bearings of 3+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Catana FE?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX
