Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X stands out for a ball bearings of 4+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX
