Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (5.99 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Solid value at €208.50, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
