Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 DH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX stands out for a ball bearings of 4+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X
