Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX stands out for a ball bearings of 3+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX
