Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Sienna
Spinning
51.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Shimano Sienna 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sienna 2500X stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sienna?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sienna 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.14 out of 10 (71 centimeter / 27.95 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
