Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano TLD 25X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano TLD
Seafishing
75.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.81 out of 10
Gear ratio3.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight695g / 24.52oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €183.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano TLD 25X edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch) and the ball bearings (4). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 6,8kg / 14,99lbs and a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano TLD?
Shimano TLD 25X
- With a gear ratio of 5.33 out of 10 (3.6:1), torque gets higher priority than speed and makes the reel great for deep sea drops or hauling heavy fish from the bottom
- Scoring 8.01 out of 10 (695g / 24,52oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 81 centimeter / 31.89 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- A bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4) provides decent smoothness with moderate corrosion resistance
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 4000-HX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 4000-HX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX
