Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano TORIUM
Multireels
90.90 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.9:1
Maximum drag14kg / 30.86lbs
Weight790g / 27.87oz
Line retireve per crank88.9 centimeter / 35 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €279.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 PGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.6/420
Conclusion
Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (88.9 centimeter / 35 inch) and ball bearings (5). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano TORIUM?
Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX
- For a score of 5.89 out of 10 (3.9:1) in gear ratio, the reel leans towards power over speed, making it handy when you need that extra muscle during tough fights
- Scoring 8.59 out of 10 (88.9 centimeter / 35 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
- A 7 out of 10 (5) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X
