Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €409.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85
Conclusion
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.0:1) and line retrieve per crank (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG?
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX
