Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000HGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/195
Conclusion
Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and gear ratio (6.1:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Vanford FA?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.57 out of 10 (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX
