Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics4.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight280g / 9.87oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000S R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). While Shimano Sahara 3000S R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sahara 3000S R?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 3000S R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9.87oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X
