Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
Spinning
29.20 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €53.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). While Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
- Solid value at €208.50, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX
Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX
Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X
Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX
Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
