Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 SFI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI stands out for a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8.64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73cm / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X
