Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Spinning
63.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160 lb/yds: 6/200, 8/140, 10/120
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8.64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag
