Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Shimano Sedona 500 FI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona 500 FI stands out for a gear ratio of 5.6:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sedona 500 FI?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6.3oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX
