Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI stands out for a gear ratio of 6.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7.58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.29 out of 10 (79cm / 31.10 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX
