Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8.82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
