Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and weight (160g / 5,64oz). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X
