Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF
Seafishing
58.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics5.41 out of 10
Gear ratio4.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight695g / 24.52oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €43.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/460
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX and Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX offers a maximum drag of 13,6kg / 29,98lbs, while Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF stands out for a gear ratio of 4.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF
- Scoring 8.2 out of 10 (4.3:1), this reel offers a faster line retrieval, making it a good option for chasing pelagics or (and in practice useful for to quickly reset)
- Scoring 8.01 out of 10 (695g / 24,52oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX
