Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX
