Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX
