Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Cormoran Sportline 2PiF?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
