Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in weight (265g / 9,35oz) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.49 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Mitchell 308 2000X
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Mitchell 308 2000X
Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
Mitchell 308 2000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX