Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (290g / 10,23oz). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.34 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
