Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
