Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in weight (170g / 6oz) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX
