Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in weight (175g / 6,17oz) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX
