Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in weight (170g / 6oz) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4000X
