Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in weight (175g / 6,17oz) and durability (8.53 out of 10). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X
