Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and weight (195g / 6,88oz). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX
